GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon RX 560

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 113.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
Performance
Leading raw performance (+113.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-113.7%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 71% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX 560.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+71%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 560's 3,682 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 113.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
7,869+114%
3,682
Architecture
Turing
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896
1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+14%
2.611 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+31%
1275 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
56
64+14%
L1 Cache
896 KB+250%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-33%
450W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
229mm
170mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70 C
Perf/Watt
104.9+114%
49.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 560 costs 20% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 70.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 560
MSRP
$149
$99-34%
Avg Price (30d)
$75
$60-20%
Performance per Dollar
104.9+71%
61.4
Codename
TU117
Polaris 21
Release
April 23 2019
April 18 2017
Ranking
#323
#527