
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 7500

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 320.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7500.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+320.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-320.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $229 for the Radeon RX 7500, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1182.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1182.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 7500

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 7500
The Radeon RX 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,873 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 7500's 1,873 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 320.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7500 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 7500). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+320% | 1,873 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+278% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2450 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7500 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7500 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 216 GB/s (Radeon RX 7500) — a 68.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 7500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 7500) — the Radeon RX 7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 216 GB/s+69% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 7500's 175W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon RX 7500). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-57% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+880% | 10.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon RX 7500 launched at $229 and now averages $229. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 67.2% less ($154 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.2 (Radeon RX 7500) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1179.3% better value. The Radeon RX 7500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-35% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-67% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+1179% | 8.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #323 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















