
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 8050S

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 8050S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 8050S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 8050S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon RX 8050S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 8050S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 105.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-105.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+105.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.5 / Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $400 for the Radeon RX 8050S, it costs 81% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 159.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+159.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 8050S

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 8050S
The Radeon RX 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2800 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,167 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 8050S's 16,167 — the Radeon RX 8050S leads by 105.5%. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 (Radeon RX 8050S). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 16,167+105% |
| Shading Units | 896+2700% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2800 MHz+68% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 8050S has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon RX 8050S) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 8050S. Bus width: 128-bit vs System Shared.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | none |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | LPDDR5X (Shared) |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s (Max)+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System Shared |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 8050S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon RX 8050S). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 8050S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 8050S's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon RX 8050S). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 293.9+180% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon RX 8050S launched at $400 and now averages $400. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 81.3% less ($325 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 40.4 (Radeon RX 8050S) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 159.7% better value. The Radeon RX 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-63% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-81% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9+160% | 40.4 |
| Codename | TU117 | — |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #149 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











