GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon RX 9070 GRE

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 9070 GRE

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 9070 GRE

2025Core: 1420 MHzBoost: 2790 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon RX 9070 GRE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 210.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-210.3%)
Leading raw performance (+210.3%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 / 4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (280mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $575 for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE, it costs 87% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 147.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+147.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($575)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 9070 GRE

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon RX 9070 GRE

The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 8 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1420 MHz to 2790 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,418 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 24,418 — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads by 210.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,072 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 34.28 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2790 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
G3D Mark Score
7,869
24,418+210%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
896
3072+243%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
34.28 TFLOPS+1049%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2790 MHz+68%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
56
192+243%
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
12 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
432 GB/s+238%
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
8 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,H.265,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Power connectors: None vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
TDP
75W-66%
220W
Recommended PSU
300W-54%
650W
Power Connector
None
2x 8-pin
Length
229mm
280mm
Height
111mm
127mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
104.9
111.0+6%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE launched at $575. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Radeon RX 9070 GRE
MSRP
$149-74%
$575
Avg Price (30d)
$75
Codename
TU117
Navi 48
Release
April 23 2019
May 8 2025
Ranking
#323
#44