GeForce GTX 1650 vs RadeonT Vega 8

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 315.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT Vega 8.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+315.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-315.5%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RadeonT Vega 8 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RadeonT Vega 8

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RadeonT Vega 8

The RadeonT Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,894 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RadeonT Vega 8's 1,894 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 315.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RadeonT Vega 8 uses GCN 5.1, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 (RadeonT Vega 8). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (RadeonT Vega 8). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
G3D Mark Score	7,869+315%	1,894
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.1
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896+100%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+75%	1.702 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1900 MHz+14%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	56+100%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT Vega 8 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (RadeonT Vega 8). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 1.0 (RadeonT Vega 8). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT Vega 8).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 1.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RadeonT Vega 8's 45W — a 50% difference. The RadeonT Vega 8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (RadeonT Vega 8). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RadeonT Vega 8
TDP	75W	45W-40%
Recommended PSU	300W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+149%	42.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RadeonT Vega 8 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The RadeonT Vega 8 costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (RadeonT Vega 8) — the RadeonT Vega 8 offers Infinity% better value. The RadeonT Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).