GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 91.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-91.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+91.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 15,073 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 91.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2130 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 15,073+92% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2816+214% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+302% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2130 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 88+57% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.8 MB+218% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 75% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 50W — a 40% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 301.5+187% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | AD107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #323 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
