GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 89.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-89.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+89.5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 14,909 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 89.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2115 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 14,909+89% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 3072+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 12.99 TFLOPS+335% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2115 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 96+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 3 MB+241% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 100% advantage for the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 256 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (Ada) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (Ada) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 40% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 298.2+184% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | AD107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #155 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
