GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

2025Core: 577 MHzBoost: 1432 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

30,020

+281.5%

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

TITAN RTX

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3090

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4080

GeForce RTX 5080

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

125%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

120%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

120%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

117%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

117%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

113%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

111%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

102%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

100%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

98%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

96%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

96%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

93%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

90%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

88%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

85%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

84%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

83%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

82%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

80%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 281.5% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-281.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+281.5%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (24 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,750 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition, it costs 96% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 511.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+511.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,750)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition leads by 281.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1432 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
G3D Mark Score	7,869	30,020+281%
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	896	8960+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	25.66 TFLOPS+760%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+16%	1432 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	280+400%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	8.8 MB+900%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	24 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 72°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
TDP	75W	70W-7%
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	167mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-3%	72°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	428.9+309%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999 and now averages $1750. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95.7% less ($1675 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 17.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 509.9% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).