GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Why is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1650?
The matchup between the professional RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile and the desktop GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER highlights the massive generational leap from budget legacy hardware to modern mobile workhorses. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a top-tier mobile workstation card that utilizes NVIDIA's newest architecture and GDDR7 memory. In benchmarks, it provides a 400-500% performance increase over the older GTX 1650 SUPER, effortlessly handling 1440p tasks that the 16-series card would find unplayable.
On the technical side, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell features dedicated hardware for Blackwell-era Ray Tracing and DLSS 4, neither of which the GTX 1650 SUPER possesses. With 16GB or more of high-speed VRAM, the mobile PRO card is also immune to the stutters that affect the 4GB buffer of the 1650 SUPER in modern titles. Furthermore, the PRO variant offers certified drivers for enterprise stability, which is critical for professional engineering and 3D modeling work that the consumer 1650 was never designed for.
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the definitive winner in this comparison, providing a level of speed and professional utility that vastly outclasses the older desktop budget card. While the GTX 1650 SUPER was a popular value choice in 2019, it is now outmatched by modern mobile technology in every conceivable metric. For gamers and professionals alike, the jump to a Blackwell-powered workstation is a transformative upgrade for any 2026 workload.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 356.6% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-356.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+356.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 82 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,929 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 35,929 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile leads by 356.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10,496 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 35.27 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 35,929+357% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 10496+1071% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 35.27 TFLOPS+1082% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 56 | 328+486% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 10.3 MB+1070% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 64 MB+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) — a 700% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 64 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 24 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+700% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 64 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | NVENC (Blackwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (Blackwell) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile's 95W — a 23.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-21% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 378.2+261% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GB203 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #323 | #106 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
