GeForce GTX 1650 vs RTXA5000-24Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

81%

#316

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

11452%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

100%

#333

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

99%

#334

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

98%

#335

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

98%

#336

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

98%

#337

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

97%

#338

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

96%

#339

Quadro 4000

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30

95%

#340

FireStream 9250

MSRP: $999|Avg: $49

91%

#341

GRID P40-3Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

89%

#342

GRID M10-2Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

84%

#343

Tesla K80

MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50

83%

#344

GRID M10-4Q

MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340

82%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 63.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-24Q.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-24Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+63.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-63.8%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $2,100 for the RTXA5000-24Q, it costs 96% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 4487.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-24Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+4487.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-24Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTXA5000-24Q

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTXA5000-24Q

The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 4,803 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 63.8%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-24Q
G3D Mark Score	7,869+64%	4,803
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	896	8192+814%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+831%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1695 MHz+2%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	256+357%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	8 MB+809%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-24Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-24Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-24Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	RTXA5000-24Q
TDP	75W-67%	230W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+402%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721 and now averages $2100. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 96.4% less ($2025 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4460.9% better value. The RTXA5000-24Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).