GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Tesla M10

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla M10

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M10

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
83%
#319
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11632%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
100%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
100%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
99%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
98%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
98%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
97%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
92%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
85%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
84%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
83%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
82%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
81%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 148% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M10.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
Performance
Leading raw performance (+148%)
Lower raw frame rates (-148%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $500 for the Tesla M10, it costs 85% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1553.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1553.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Tesla M10

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

Tesla M10

The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Tesla M10's 3,173 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 148%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
G3D Mark Score
7,869+148%
3,173
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896+40%
640 ×4
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS+78%
1.672 TFLOPS ×4
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+27%
1306 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16 ×4
TMUs
56+40%
40 ×4
L1 Cache
896 KB+180%
320 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M10 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12_1 (Tesla M10). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M10). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+644%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.3 (Tesla M10) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1565.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650Tesla M10
MSRP
$149-94%
$2500
Avg Price (30d)
$75-85%
$500
Performance per Dollar
104.9+1565%
6.3
Codename
TU117
GM107
Release
April 23 2019
May 18 2016
Ranking
#323
#570