GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla T10

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

173%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

165%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

143%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

138%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

121%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

113%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

112%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

111%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

107%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

107%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

102%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

100%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

98%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

97%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

96%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

93%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

89%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

87%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

86%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

85%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

81%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

80%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

78%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

78%

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

70%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

69%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla T10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 59.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-59.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+59.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $975 for the Tesla T10, it costs 92% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 714.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+714.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($975)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Tesla T10 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Tesla T10

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Tesla T10

The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Tesla T10's 12,558 — the Tesla T10 leads by 59.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
G3D Mark Score	7,869	12,558+60%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	896	4608+414%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	14.38 TFLOPS+382%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+7%	1560 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	56	288+414%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The Tesla T10 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 110.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla T10
TDP	75W-71%	260W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+117%	48.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000 and now averages $975. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 92.3% less ($900 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.9 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 713.2% better value.