GeForce GTX 1650
VS
TITAN V CEO Edition

GeForce GTX 1650 vs TITAN V CEO Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS

TITAN V CEO Edition

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The TITAN V CEO Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 115.9% higher G3D Mark score and 681.3% more VRAM (31 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-115.9%)
Leading raw performance (+115.9%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Volta (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+681.3%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $5,300 for the TITAN V CEO Edition, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 3173.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3173.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($75)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and TITAN V CEO Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

TITAN V CEO Edition

The TITAN V CEO Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 21 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,988 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the TITAN V CEO Edition's 16,988 — the TITAN V CEO Edition leads by 115.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the TITAN V CEO Edition uses Volta, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5,120 (TITAN V CEO Edition). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V CEO Edition). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
G3D Mark Score
7,869
16,988+116%
Architecture
Turing
Volta
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
896
5120+471%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
14.9 TFLOPS+399%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+14%
1455 MHz
ROPs
32
128+300%
TMUs
56
320+471%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
10 MB+1036%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V CEO Edition has 31 GB. The TITAN V CEO Edition offers 681.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 868 GB/s (TITAN V CEO Edition) — a 578.1% advantage for the TITAN V CEO Edition. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6 MB (TITAN V CEO Edition) — the TITAN V CEO Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
31.25 GB+681%
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
868 GB/s+578%
Bus Width
128-bit
4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+27%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 6.0 (TITAN V CEO Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V CEO Edition).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
VCN 6.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the TITAN V CEO Edition's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (TITAN V CEO Edition). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
TDP
75W-70%
250W
Recommended PSU
300W-50%
600W
Power Connector
None
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
229mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
104.9+54%
68.0
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the TITAN V CEO Edition launched at $0 and now averages $5300. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.6% less ($5225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.2 (TITAN V CEO Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3178.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650TITAN V CEO Edition
MSRP
$149
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$75-99%
$5300
Performance per Dollar
104.9+3178%
3.2
Codename
TU117
GV100
Release
April 23 2019
June 21 2018
Ranking
#323
#115