GeForce GTX 1650 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 505.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+505.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-505.3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,300 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)'s 1,300 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 505.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 32 (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+505% | 1,300 |
| Architecture | Turing | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+2700% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+51% | 1100 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 11). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Quick Sync Video (Gen 11) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)'s 15W — a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0W (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+21% | 86.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)) — the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | TU117 | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 28 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #820 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
