GeForce GTX 1650 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 227.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+227.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-227.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 14.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 2,400 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 227.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 12 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+228% | 2,400 |
| Architecture | Turing | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+1767% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+15% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 91.3% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 28W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+22% | 85.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs costs 73.3% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 120.0 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers 14.4% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $20-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.9 | 120.0+14% |
| Codename | TU117 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | April 23 2019 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #712 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
