Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro 2000 D

CPUCPUGPUGPU

HD Graphics P630

2016Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro 2000 D Performance Spectrum

HD Graphics P630
Shared System RAM 15
1,280
+3.3%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
Quadro 2000 D
4 GB 62
1,239
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 630
brand logoGeForce 920A
brand logoGeForce GT 645M
brand logoGeForce 840M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro 2000 D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics P630

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 62W, a 47W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quadro 2000 D

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅HD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 2000 D is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌313.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics P630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (1,280 vs 1,239), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 2000 D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000 D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. HD Graphics P630 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro 2000 D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics P630

The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000 D

The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics P630 scores 1,280 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P630) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
G3D Mark Score
1,280+3%
1,239
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Fermi
Process Node
14 nm++
40 nm
Shading Units
192
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4224 TFLOPS
0.48 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
32+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics P630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D carries 4 GB. Quadro 2000 D gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics P630 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 D.

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P630) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro 2000 D). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (HD Graphics P630) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Quadro 2000 D).

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
Encoder
Quick Sync Video
—
Decoder
Quick Sync Video
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 122.1% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
TDP
15W-76%
62W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
—
178mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
85.3+326%
20.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics P630 came in at $0, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599. On MSRP, HD Graphics P630 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (HD Graphics P630) vs 2.1 (Quadro 2000 D) — the HD Graphics P630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics P630 (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureHD Graphics P630Quadro 2000 D
MSRP
$0-100%
$599
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.1
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
GF106
Release
August 5 2016
October 5 2011
Ranking
#822
#892
Search HD Graphics P630 on AmazonSearch Quadro 2000 D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.