HD Graphics P630 vs Tesla M2070-Q
HD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M2070-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics P630.
| Insight | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M2070-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics P630 and Tesla M2070-Q
HD Graphics P630
The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P630 scores 1,280 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P630) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,280 | 1,306+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 448+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4224 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS+143% |
| ROPs | 3 | 48+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The Tesla M2070-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 85.3+1371% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics P630 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 and now averages $50. The HD Graphics P630 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (HD Graphics P630) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the HD Graphics P630 offers Infinity% better value. The HD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $5489 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 26.1 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF100 |
| Release | August 5 2016 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #822 | #798 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics P630 and Tesla M2070-Q
