HD Graphics P630
Tesla M2070-Q
HD Graphics P630 vs Tesla M2070-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
HD Graphics P630 vs Tesla M2070-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
HD Graphics P630 vs Tesla M2070-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
HD Graphics P630
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
Tesla M2070-Q
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics P630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla M2070-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics P630 vs Tesla M2070-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
HD Graphics P630
The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics P630 scores 1,280 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 14 nm++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics P630) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,280 | 1,306+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 448+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4224 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS+143% |
| ROPs | 3 | 48+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics P630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q carries 512 MB. Tesla M2070-Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics P630 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2070-Q.
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics P630) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 85.3+1371% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the HD Graphics P630 came in at $0, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489. On MSRP, HD Graphics P630 was 100+% cheaper ($5489 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (HD Graphics P630) vs 0.2 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the HD Graphics P630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics P630 (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | HD Graphics P630 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $5489 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.2 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GF100 |
| Release | August 5 2016 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #822 | #798 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics P630 and Tesla M2070-Q
