Core i5-13400F
VS
Core 2 Duo T6670

Core i5-13400F vs Core 2 Duo T6670

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T6670

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T6670

#462
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
620%
#463
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
611%
#464
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
561%
#465
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
559%
#466
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
553%
#468
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
534%
#469
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
512%
#470
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
512%
#471
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
498%
#474
Core 2 Duo T6670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-13400F (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-13400FCore 2 Duo T6670
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T6670 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-13400FCore 2 Duo T6670
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Core 2 Duo T6670

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T6670

The Core 2 Duo T6670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,365 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T6670 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T6670 — a 70.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core 2 Duo T6670's 2,365 — a 165.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 252, a 162.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 252 (191.4% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T6670.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore 2 Duo T6670
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+400%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+109%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+900%
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB+60%
Process
Intel 7 nm-84%
45 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
25,029+958%
2,365
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+855%
252
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408+4427%
252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 2 Duo T6670 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T6670 — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T6670) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T6670).

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore 2 Duo T6670
Socket
LGA1700
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+355%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+2300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T6670). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core 2 Duo T6670 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core 2 Duo T6670 rivals Core 2 Duo T6600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FCore 2 Duo T6670
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Gaming
Budget