Core i5-13600K vs PRO A10-8770E
Core i5-13600K
PRO A10-8770E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-8770E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) | ✅ More affordable ($210) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+726%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) | ✅ More affordable ($210) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and PRO A10-8770E
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
PRO A10-8770E
The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the PRO A10-8770E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E — a 37.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the PRO A10-8770E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the PRO A10-8770E's 3,001 — a 170.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+250% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+46% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2048 kB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-75% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 37,655+1155% | 3,001 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the PRO A10-8770E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (PRO A10-8770E). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the PRO A10-8770E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the PRO A10-8770E debuted at $395. At current prices ($319 vs $210), the PRO A10-8770E is $109 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 118.0 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the PRO A10-8770E — making the Core i5-13600K the 156.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | PRO A10-8770E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-17% | $395 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $319 | $210-34% |
| Performance per Dollar | 118.0+725% | 14.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13600K and PRO A10-8770E
