Core i5-13600K vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Core i5-13600K
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600K
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2680 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | Xeon E5-2680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-EP (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-13600K | Xeon E5-2680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($319) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Xeon E5-2680 v4
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.
Xeon E5-2680 v4
The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,292 points. Launch price was $1,745.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2680 v4's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Xeon E5-2680 v4's 17,292 — a 74.1% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2680 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon E5-2680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 14 / 28 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+55% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 35 MB+46% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+75% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 37,655+118% | 17,292 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2680 v4 — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 supports 199.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2680 v4 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2680 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2680 v4) — the Xeon E5-2680 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and C612 (Xeon E5-2680 v4).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon E5-2680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 2400+47900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+13107100% | 1536 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 40+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2680 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2680 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Xeon E5-2680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-13600K and Xeon E5-2680 v4
