L40
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
L40 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
L40 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
L40 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌3344.4% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,100 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3065.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (29,964 vs 32,601).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌L40 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
L40 vs Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L40 scores 32,601 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the L40 leads by 8.8%. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 568 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+9% | 29,964 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+610% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+1033% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz+60% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+200% | 64 |
| TMUs | 568+255% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+612% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+2300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+255% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+78% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The L40 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L40 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) carries 8 GB. L40 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the L40 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+2300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 110W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7 | 272.4+151% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the L40 came in at $31000, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) was 97.1% cheaper ($30100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (L40) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 2927.3% better value. The newer card here is L40 (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | L40 | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $900-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 33.3+2927% |
| Codename | AD102 | TU104 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #61 | #201 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40 and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
