L40
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
L40 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
L40 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
L40 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 355W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌3003.1% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 31.3 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2877.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.3 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌18.3% higher power demand at 355W vs 300W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
L40 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The L40 scores 32,601 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 568 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+4% | 31,285 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+196% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+47% | 61.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz | 2498 MHz |
| ROPs | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 568+48% | 384 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+493% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+48% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The L40 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX carries 24 GB. L40 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the L40 and 384-bit on the Radeon RX 7900 XTX. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 16.8% difference. The L40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 287mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-15% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-6% | 800W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 287mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 68°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7+23% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the L40 came in at $31000, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7900 XTX was 96.8% cheaper ($30001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (L40) vs 31.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 2745.5% better value.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $999-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 31.3+2745% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #61 | #12 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX
