L40 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX
L40
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar L40
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The L40 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (48 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7900 XTX.
| Insight | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (287mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $930 versus $8,174 for the L40, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 743.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+743.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,174) | ✅More affordable ($930) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1929 MHz to 2498 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 355W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,285 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The L40 scores 32,601 and the Radeon RX 7900 XTX reaches 31,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 6,144 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 61.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 2498 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 96 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) with 568 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+4% | 31,285 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+196% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+47% | 61.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz | 2498 MHz |
| ROPs | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 568+48% | 384 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+493% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+48% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L40 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 24 GB. The L40 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 960 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+1500% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs AMD Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs AMD Dual Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX).
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | AMD Dual Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's 355W — a 16.8% difference. The L40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 800W (Radeon RX 7900 XTX). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 287mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-15% | 355W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-6% | 800W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 287mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 68°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7+23% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The L40 launched at $31000 MSRP and currently averages $8174, while the Radeon RX 7900 XTX launched at $999 and now averages $930. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX costs 88.6% less ($7244 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.0 (L40) vs 33.6 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) — the Radeon RX 7900 XTX offers 740% better value.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $999-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8174 | $930-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0 | 33.6+740% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #61 | #12 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX
