
L40
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅+96.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌11424.2% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 165W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 5761.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 300W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,581 vs 32,601).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
L40
2022Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+96.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30,731 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 5761.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 300W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌11424.2% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 165W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,581 vs 32,601).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is L40 better than Radeon RX 7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7600 make more sense than L40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 999 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 978 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 734 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 880 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 734 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 569 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 273 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40 and Radeon RX 7600

L40
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L40 scores 32,601 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the L40 leads by 96.6%. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 568 Tensor cores.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+97% | 16,581 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+788% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+316% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz | 2655 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 192+200% | 64 |
| TMUs | 568+344% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+3460% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+344% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L40 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The L40 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 233.3% advantage for the L40. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+233% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 165W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 550W-27% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7+8% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The L40 launched at $31000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 99.1% less ($30731 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (L40) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 5500% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | L40 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $269-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 61.6+5500% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #61 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












