
L40

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
L40 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
L40 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
L40 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
L40
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌675% HIGHER MSRP$31,000 MSRPvs$4,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($31,000 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $27,000 less on MSRP ($4,000 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 619.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $31,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
L40 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L40 scores 32,601 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the L40 leads by 7.7%. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 568 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+8% | 30,269 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+42% | 12800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+39% | 65.28 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz | 2550 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 192+9% | 176 |
| TMUs | 568+42% | 400 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+42% | 12.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+33% | 72 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+42% | 100 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+42% | 400 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The L40 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L40 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation carries 32 GB. L40 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 66.7% advantage for the L40. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the L40 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+50% | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+67% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+33% | 72 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7 | 121.1+11% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the L40 came in at $31000, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. On MSRP, RTX 5000 Ada Generation was 87.1% cheaper ($27000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (L40) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 590.9% better value. The newer card here is RTX 5000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | L40 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $4000-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | 7.6+591% |
| Codename | AD102 | AD102 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #61 | #16 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














