CPU
GPU
L40S
Popular choices:
TITAN V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar L40S
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The L40S uses modern memory architecture. The L40S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the L40S offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,045 versus $7,500 for the L40S, it costs 86% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 619.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+619.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($7,500) | ✅More affordable ($1,045) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40S and TITAN V
L40S
The L40S is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,023 points.
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The L40S scores 20,023 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L40S is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40S) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 91.61 TFLOPS (L40S) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,023 | 20,077 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Volta |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+255% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.61 TFLOPS+515% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+73% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 568+78% | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+137% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+967% | 4.5 MB |
| Tensor Cores | 568 | 640+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40S comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The L40S offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40S) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 47% advantage for the L40S. Bus width: 384-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L40S) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the L40S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+47% | 653 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 3072-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+967% | 4.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40S) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40S) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (L40S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40S draws 300W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 800W (L40S) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 800W | 600W-25% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.7 | 80.3+20% |
Value Analysis
The L40S launched at $7500 MSRP and currently averages $7500, while the TITAN V launched at $2999 and now averages $1045. The TITAN V costs 86.1% less ($6455 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (L40S) vs 19.2 (TITAN V) — the TITAN V offers 611.1% better value. The L40S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | L40S | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7500 | $2999-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $7500 | $1045-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 19.2+611% |
| Codename | AD102 | GV100 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #76 | #109 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40S and TITAN V
