M1 Max
VS
EPYC 7203P

M1 Max vs EPYC 7203P

M1 Max

10 Cores10 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.22 GHz2021
VS
AMD

EPYC 7203P

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M1 Max

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
134%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
132%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
122%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
122%
#199
M1 Max
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7203P

#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
122%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
122%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
111%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
111%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
107%
#27
EPYC 7203P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7203P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM1 MaxEPYC 7203P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M1 Max ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM1 MaxEPYC 7203P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M1 Max and EPYC 7203P

M1 Max

The M1 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,146 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

EPYC 7203P

The EPYC 7203P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,017 points. Launch price was $348.

Processing Power

The M1 Max packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the EPYC 7203P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M1 Max has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Max versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7203P — a 5.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 7203P (base: 2.06 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7203P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Max scores 22,146 against the EPYC 7203P's 22,017 — a 0.6% lead for the M1 Max. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M1 Max vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7203P.

FeatureM1 MaxEPYC 7203P
Cores / Threads
10 / 10+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.22 GHz
3.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2.06 GHz
2.8 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
48 MB
64 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
28 MB+5500%
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
22,146
22,017
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M1 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7203P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM1 MaxEPYC 7203P
Socket
none
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
8
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: ARM-V (M1 Max) / not specified (EPYC 7203P). The M1 Max includes integrated graphics (M1 Max GPU), while the EPYC 7203P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Max targets Mobile Workstation.

FeatureM1 MaxEPYC 7203P
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
M1 Max GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
ARM-V
Target Use
Mobile Workstation