M1 Max vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M1 Max vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M1 Max vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M1 Max

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with M1 Max GPU, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,132 vs 22,146).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 48 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while M1 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than M1 Max?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is ahead with a 18.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, M1 Max pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. M1 Max also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M1 Max is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M1 Max vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M1 Max

The M1 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,146 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The M1 Max packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the M1 Max has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Max versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 43.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 2.06 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is built on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Max scores 22,146 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 0.1% lead for the M1 Max. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M1 Max vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

Feature	M1 Max	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 10+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.22 GHz	5 GHz+55%
Base Clock	2.06 GHz	4.3 GHz+109%
L3 Cache	48 MB+200%	16 MB
L2 Cache	28 MB+367%	6 MB
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	—	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	22,146	22,132

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M1 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	M1 Max	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Socket	none	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	8	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: ARM-V (M1 Max) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS). The M1 Max includes integrated graphics (M1 Max GPU), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Max targets Mobile Workstation.