M1 Max vs Ryzen 5 7400

M1 Max

10 Cores10 Thrd28 WWMax: 3.22 GHz2021

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7400

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2025

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

M1 Max

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with M1 Max GPU, while Ryzen 5 7400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 5 7400

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M1 Max across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (22,010 vs 22,146).
    • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 48 MB).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while M1 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is M1 Max better than Ryzen 5 7400?
    Yes. M1 Max is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, M1 Max is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M1 Max is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 16 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    M1 Max is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7400 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. M1 Max is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7400 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (96.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM5 + DDR5 setup, Ryzen 5 7400 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 7400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    1080p
    low183 FPS146 FPS
    medium146 FPS121 FPS
    high117 FPS105 FPS
    ultra93 FPS87 FPS
    1440p
    low152 FPS132 FPS
    medium118 FPS108 FPS
    high91 FPS91 FPS
    ultra73 FPS74 FPS
    4K
    low71 FPS72 FPS
    medium59 FPS63 FPS
    high46 FPS51 FPS
    ultra37 FPS40 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    1080p
    low236 FPS296 FPS
    medium211 FPS256 FPS
    high172 FPS229 FPS
    ultra137 FPS200 FPS
    1440p
    low200 FPS260 FPS
    medium182 FPS230 FPS
    high153 FPS210 FPS
    ultra117 FPS182 FPS
    4K
    low122 FPS204 FPS
    medium113 FPS183 FPS
    high99 FPS169 FPS
    ultra81 FPS146 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    1080p
    low554 FPS550 FPS
    medium554 FPS550 FPS
    high554 FPS550 FPS
    ultra510 FPS550 FPS
    1440p
    low554 FPS550 FPS
    medium473 FPS550 FPS
    high415 FPS531 FPS
    ultra364 FPS481 FPS
    4K
    low417 FPS419 FPS
    medium323 FPS349 FPS
    high274 FPS297 FPS
    ultra221 FPS239 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    1080p
    low554 FPS550 FPS
    medium554 FPS550 FPS
    high554 FPS550 FPS
    ultra554 FPS550 FPS
    1440p
    low554 FPS550 FPS
    medium554 FPS550 FPS
    high532 FPS550 FPS
    ultra453 FPS533 FPS
    4K
    low509 FPS550 FPS
    medium451 FPS510 FPS
    high394 FPS445 FPS
    ultra341 FPS379 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of M1 Max and Ryzen 5 7400

    M1 Max

    The M1 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,146 points. Launch price was $299.

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 7400

    The Ryzen 5 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,010 points. Launch price was $299.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The M1 Max packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7400 offers 6 cores / 12 threads β€” the M1 Max has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Max versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400 β€” a 28.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7400 (base: 2.06 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7400 is built on the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Max scores 22,146 against the Ryzen 5 7400's 22,010 β€” a 0.6% lead for the M1 Max. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M1 Max vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400.

    FeatureM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    Cores / Threads
    10 / 10+67%
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    3.22 GHz
    4.3 GHz+34%
    Base Clock
    2.06 GHz
    3.3 GHz+60%
    L3 Cache
    48 MB+200%
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    28 MB+2700%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    5 nm
    5 nm
    Architecture
    β€”
    Raphael (2023βˆ’2025)
    PassMark
    22,146
    22,010
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The M1 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7400 uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    Socket
    none
    AM5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR5-6400
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    8
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: ARM-V (M1 Max) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7400). The M1 Max includes integrated graphics (M1 Max GPU), while the Ryzen 5 7400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Max targets Mobile Workstation.

    FeatureM1 MaxRyzen 5 7400
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    β€”
    IGPU Model
    M1 Max GPU
    β€”
    Unlocked
    No
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    ARM-V
    β€”
    Target Use
    Mobile Workstation
    β€”