M3 Max 14-Core
VS
EPYC 7303P

M3 Max 14-Core vs EPYC 7303P

M3 Max 14-Core

14 Cores14 ThrdWMax: 4.06 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 14-Core

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
122%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
120%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
111%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
111%
#196
M3 Max 14-Core
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303P

#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
103%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
102%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
100%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($594) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7303P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM3 Max 14-CoreEPYC 7303P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($594)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M3 Max 14-Core ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($594 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM3 Max 14-CoreEPYC 7303P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($594)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M3 Max 14-Core and EPYC 7303P

M3 Max 14-Core

The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

Processing Power

The M3 Max 14-Core packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7303P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P — a 17.7% clock advantage for the M3 Max 14-Core (base: 2.748 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7303P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Max 14-Core scores 36,529 against the EPYC 7303P's 36,487 — a 0.1% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.

FeatureM3 Max 14-CoreEPYC 7303P
Cores / Threads
14 / 14
16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock
4.06 GHz+19%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.748 GHz+15%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
36,529
36,487
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M3 Max 14-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7303P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core versus 3200 on the EPYC 7303P — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 190.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) vs 8 (EPYC 7303P). PCIe lanes: 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) vs 128 (EPYC 7303P) — the EPYC 7303P offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core) and SP3 (EPYC 7303P).

FeatureM3 Max 14-CoreEPYC 7303P
Socket
none
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
6400+100%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
96
4096+4167%
RAM Channels
0
8
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P). The M3 Max 14-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX; EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330.

FeatureM3 Max 14-CoreEPYC 7303P
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
AMD-V, IOMMU