
M3 Max 14-Core

Xeon w5-3425
M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon w5-3425 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon w5-3425 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon w5-3425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M3 Max 14-Core
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core), while Xeon w5-3425 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3425, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon w5-3425
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,178 vs 36,529).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,189 MSRP, while M3 Max 14-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M3 Max 14-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-3425 better than M3 Max 14-Core?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon w5-3425 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M3 Max 14-Core
The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon w5-3425
The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.
Processing Power
The M3 Max 14-Core packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the M3 Max 14-Core has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3425 (base: 2.748 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon w5-3425 is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Max 14-Core scores 36,529 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 1% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.
| Feature | M3 Max 14-Core | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.06 GHz | 4.6 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.748 GHz | 3.2 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | — | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | — | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 36,529 | 36,178 |
Memory & Platform
The M3 Max 14-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3425 — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 4166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).
| Feature | M3 Max 14-Core | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+33% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 4096 GB+4167% |
| RAM Channels | 0 | 8 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 112 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3425 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3425). The M3 Max 14-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)), while the Xeon w5-3425 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX.
| Feature | M3 Max 14-Core | Xeon w5-3425 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














