EPYC 7303P
VS
M3 Max 14-Core

EPYC 7303P vs M3 Max 14-Core

AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
VS

M3 Max 14-Core

14 Cores14 ThrdWMax: 4.06 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303P

#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
103%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
102%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
100%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 14-Core

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
122%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
120%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
111%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
111%
#196
M3 Max 14-Core
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($594) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7303P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7303PM3 Max 14-Core
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($594)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M3 Max 14-Core ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($594 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7303PM3 Max 14-Core
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($594)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303P and M3 Max 14-Core

AMD

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

M3 Max 14-Core

The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the M3 Max 14-Core offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core — a 17.7% clock advantage for the M3 Max 14-Core (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The EPYC 7303P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the M3 Max 14-Core's 36,529 — a 0.1% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.

FeatureEPYC 7303PM3 Max 14-Core
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+14%
14 / 14
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.06 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.748 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
36,487
36,529
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M3 Max 14-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 190.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) — the EPYC 7303P offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core).

FeatureEPYC 7303PM3 Max 14-Core
Socket
SP3
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
6400+100%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+4167%
96
RAM Channels
8
0
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core). The M3 Max 14-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX.

FeatureEPYC 7303PM3 Max 14-Core
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)