
EPYC 7303P

M3 Max 14-Core
EPYC 7303P vs M3 Max 14-Core Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7303P vs M3 Max 14-Core FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7303P vs M3 Max 14-Core: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7303P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,487 vs 36,529).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while M3 Max 14-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while M3 Max 14-Core moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M3 Max 14-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M3 Max 14-Core
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core), while EPYC 7303P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is M3 Max 14-Core better than EPYC 7303P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7303P vs M3 Max 14-Core Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303P
The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.
M3 Max 14-Core
The M3 Max 14-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,529 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the M3 Max 14-Core offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 14-Core — a 17.7% clock advantage for the M3 Max 14-Core (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The EPYC 7303P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the M3 Max 14-Core's 36,529 — a 0.1% lead for the M3 Max 14-Core.
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | M3 Max 14-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+14% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.06 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.748 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 36,487 | 36,529 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M3 Max 14-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 6400 on the M3 Max 14-Core — the M3 Max 14-Core supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 — 4166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 0 (M3 Max 14-Core) — the EPYC 7303P offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 14-Core).
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | M3 Max 14-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+4167% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 0 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 14-Core). The M3 Max 14-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core)), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; M3 Max 14-Core rivals Core i9-13900HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7303P | M3 Max 14-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Apple M3 Max GPU (30-core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















