Core i7-13850HX vs EPYC 7303P

Core i7-13850HX vs EPYC 7303P Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13850HX

20 / 28

36,409

0.0%

36,487

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13850HX vs EPYC 7303P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13850HX vs EPYC 7303P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13850HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7303P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,409 vs 36,487).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13850HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Core i7-13850HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13850HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13850HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13850HX better than EPYC 7303P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7303P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13850HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13850HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7303P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13850HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7303P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7303P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13850HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13850HX vs EPYC 7303P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13850HX

The Core i7-13850HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,409 points. Launch price was $428.

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13850HX packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7303P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i7-13850HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i7-13850HX versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P — a 43.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13850HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13850HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7303P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13850HX scores 36,409 against the EPYC 7303P's 36,487 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13850HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P.

Feature	Core i7-13850HX	EPYC 7303P
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+56%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	36,409	36,487

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13850HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7303P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i7-13850HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7303P — the Core i7-13850HX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13850HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7303P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13850HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7303P) — the EPYC 7303P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i7-13850HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7303P).

Feature	Core i7-13850HX	EPYC 7303P
Socket	FCBGA1964	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+75%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192	4096+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13850HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13850HX) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P). The Core i7-13850HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13850HX rivals Ryzen 7 8845HS; EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330.