EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8857 v2

AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-8857 v2

12 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8857 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8857 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8857 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • +113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Costs $3,244 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $3,838 MSRP).
  • Delivers 549.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $3,838 MSRP).
  • 220% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E7-8857 v2

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (36,304 vs 36,487).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($3,838 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 7303P better than Xeon E7-8857 v2?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E7-8857 v2 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7303P also has the bigger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 7303P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7303P comes in $3,244 cheaper on MSRP at $594 MSRP versus $3,838 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8857 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 549.4% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 7303P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8857 v2 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 7303P

    The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

    Intel

    Xeon E7-8857 v2

    The Xeon E7-8857 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,304 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E7-8857 v2 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8857 v2 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7303P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Xeon E7-8857 v2's 36,304 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 30 MB on the Xeon E7-8857 v2.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon E7-8857 v2
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 32+33%
    12 / 12
    Boost Clock
    3.4 GHz
    3.6 GHz+6%
    Base Clock
    2.4 GHz
    3 GHz+25%
    L3 Cache
    64 MB (total)+113%
    30 MB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    7 nm-68%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Milan (2021−2023)
    PassMark
    36,487
    36,304
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8857 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 — the EPYC 7303P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1536 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8857 v2). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8857 v2) — the EPYC 7303P offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and C602J (Xeon E7-8857 v2).

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon E7-8857 v2
    Socket
    SP3
    LGA2011
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    Max RAM Speed
    3200+100%
    1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    4096+167%
    1536
    RAM Channels
    8+100%
    4
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128+220%
    40
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8857 v2). Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; Xeon E7-8857 v2 rivals Xeon E7-4850 v2.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon E7-8857 v2
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, IOMMU
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 7303P was priced at $594, while the Xeon E7-8857 v2 came in at $3838. On launch pricing ($594 vs $3838), EPYC 7303P was $3244 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8857 v2 — making the EPYC 7303P the 146.6% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon E7-8857 v2
    MSRP
    $594-85%
    $3838
    Performance per Dollar
    61.4+546%
    9.5
    Release Date
    2023
    2014

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.