EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6330N

AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6330N

28 Cores56 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6330N Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6330N FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6330N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
  • Costs $1,795 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $2,389 MSRP).
  • Delivers 303.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $2,389 MSRP).
  • Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6330N

2021

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (36,360 vs 36,487).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 64 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($2,389 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
    • 26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 7303P better than Xeon Gold 6330N?
    Yes. EPYC 7303P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 7303P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7303P comes in $1,795 cheaper on MSRP at $594 MSRP versus $2,389 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 303.6% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 7303P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6330N Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    EPYC 7303P

    The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

    Intel

    Xeon Gold 6330N

    The Xeon Gold 6330N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 36,360 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330N has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330N — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7303P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Xeon Gold 6330N's 36,360 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 42 MB on the Xeon Gold 6330N.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 32
    28 / 56+75%
    Boost Clock
    3.4 GHz
    3.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.4 GHz+9%
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    64 MB (total)+52%
    42 MB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    7 nm-30%
    10 nm
    Architecture
    Milan (2021−2023)
    PassMark
    36,487
    36,360
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330N uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 2667 on the Xeon Gold 6330N — the EPYC 7303P supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330N supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330N) — the EPYC 7303P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330N).

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    Socket
    SP3
    LGA4189
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    3200+20%
    2667
    Max RAM Capacity
    4096
    6144+50%
    RAM Channels
    8
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128+100%
    64
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6330N). Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; Xeon Gold 6330N rivals EPYC 7413.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, IOMMU
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the EPYC 7303P was priced at $594, while the Xeon Gold 6330N came in at $2389. On launch pricing ($594 vs $2389), EPYC 7303P was $1795 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6330N — making the EPYC 7303P the 120.6% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    MSRP
    $594-75%
    $2389
    Performance per Dollar
    61.4+304%
    15.2
    Release Date
    2023
    2021

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.