EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7303P

16 / 32

36,487

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon E7-8867 v3

16 / 32

36,908

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
✅Costs $4,078 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
✅Delivers 677.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8867 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,487 vs 36,908).

Xeon E7-8867 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8867 v3 better than EPYC 7303P?

Yes. Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8867 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8867 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7303P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E7-8867 v3 comes in 686.5% more expensive on MSRP at $4,672 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7303P is also 677.6% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 7.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7303P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), 42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon E7-8867 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

Xeon E7-8867 v3

The Xeon E7-8867 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,908 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7303P and Xeon E7-8867 v3 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — a 3% clock advantage for the EPYC 7303P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7303P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Xeon E7-8867 v3's 36,908 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E7-8867 v3. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8867 v3.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+3%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+42%	45 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Haswell-EX (2015)
PassMark	36,487	36,908+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	850
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — the EPYC 7303P supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8867 v3). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 32 (Xeon E7-8867 v3) — the EPYC 7303P offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and C602J (Xeon E7-8867 v3).

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
Socket	SP3	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+71%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+167%	1536 GB
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+300%	32

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8867 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E7-8867 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7303P was priced at $594, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 came in at $4672. On launch pricing ($594 vs $4672), EPYC 7303P was $4078 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — making the EPYC 7303P the 154.4% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP	$594-87%	$4672
Performance per Dollar	61.4+677%	7.9
Release Date	2023	2015

Search EPYC 7303P on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-8867 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.