M4 (8 cores)
VS
Core Ultra 5 125H

M4 (8 cores) vs Core Ultra 5 125H

M4 (8 cores)

8 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 125H

14 Cores18 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 (8 cores)

#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
110%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
105%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
103%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
101%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
100%
#126
M4 (8 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 125H

#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
105%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
104%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
103%
#117
Core Ultra 5 125H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
98%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
97%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
95%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 5 125H leads in gaming performance. However, the M4 (8 cores) is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightM4 (8 cores)Core Ultra 5 125H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightM4 (8 cores)Core Ultra 5 125H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 (8 cores) and Core Ultra 5 125H

M4 (8 cores)

The M4 (8 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 28 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 20,761 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 125H

The Core Ultra 5 125H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,754 points. Launch price was $375.

Processing Power

The M4 (8 cores) packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 125H offers 14 cores / 18 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the M4 (8 cores) versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125H — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 125H (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 125H is built on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (8 cores) scores 20,761 against the Core Ultra 5 125H's 20,754 — a 0% lead for the M4 (8 cores).

FeatureM4 (8 cores)Core Ultra 5 125H
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
14 / 18+75%
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.89 GHz
3.6 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
20,761
20,754
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (8 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 125H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM4 (8 cores)Core Ultra 5 125H
Socket
none
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%