M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon 6337P

M4 (8 cores)

8 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 6337P

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon 6337P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon 6337P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon 6337P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 (8 cores)

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 4W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6337P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (20,761 vs 20,917).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6337P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon 6337P

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while M4 (8 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1900% higher power demand at 80W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6337P better than M4 (8 cores)?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6337P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 (8 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6337P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6337P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon 6337P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6337P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (348.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon 6337P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon 6337P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 (8 cores)

The M4 (8 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 28 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 20,761 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon 6337P

The Xeon 6337P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,917 points. Launch price was $375.

Processing Power

The M4 (8 cores) packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon 6337P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the M4 (8 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the M4 (8 cores) versus 5 GHz on the Xeon 6337P — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 6337P (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon 6337P is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (8 cores) scores 20,761 against the Xeon 6337P's 20,917 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon 6337P.

FeatureM4 (8 cores)Xeon 6337P
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4 GHz
5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.89 GHz
3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
20,761
20,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (8 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6337P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM4 (8 cores)Xeon 6337P
Socket
none
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0