M4 Max (14 cores) vs Xeon 6505P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Max (14 cores)

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

131%

#203

M4 Max (14 cores)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6505P

#106

Xeon Gold 6143

MSRP: $342|Avg: $342

104%

#115

Xeon W-1370

MSRP: $323|Avg: $323

102%

#119

Xeon 6505P

MSRP: $563|Avg: $563

100%

#130

EPYC 9115

MSRP: $726|Avg: $726

95%

#131

EPYC 74F3

MSRP: $913|Avg: $824

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($563) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 6505P is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	M4 Max (14 cores)	Xeon 6505P
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($563)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)	✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Max (14 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($563 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	M4 Max (14 cores)	Xeon 6505P
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($563)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

M4 Max (14 cores) Benchmark Check

Xeon 6505P Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6505P

M4 Max (14 cores)

The M4 Max (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 November 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,558 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon 6505P

The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 Max (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon 6505P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the M4 Max (14 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (14 cores) versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P — a 9.5% clock advantage for the M4 Max (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon 6505P is built on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Max (14 cores) scores 38,558 against the Xeon 6505P's 39,341 — a 2% lead for the Xeon 6505P.

Feature	M4 Max (14 cores)	Xeon 6505P
Cores / Threads	14 / 14+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.51 GHz+10%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.59 GHz+18%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm	Intel 3 nm
Architecture	—	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	38,558	39,341+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Max (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6505P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Max (14 cores) versus 6400 on the Xeon 6505P — the M4 Max (14 cores) supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6505P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon 6505P). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) vs 88 (Xeon 6505P) — the Xeon 6505P offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Max (14 cores)) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P).

Feature	M4 Max (14 cores)	Xeon 6505P
Socket	none	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	8533+33%	6400
Max RAM Capacity	128	4096+3100%
RAM Channels	0	8
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	0	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6505P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Max (14 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6505P). The M4 Max (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)), while the Xeon 6505P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M4 Max (14 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390; Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334.