M4 Max (14 cores) vs Xeon W-3335
M4 Max (14 cores)
Xeon W-3335
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar M4 Max (14 cores)
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3335
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | M4 Max (14 cores) | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | M4 Max (14 cores) | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon W-3335
M4 Max (14 cores)
The M4 Max (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 November 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,558 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon W-3335
The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M4 Max (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (14 cores) versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 12% clock advantage for the M4 Max (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon W-3335 is built on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Max (14 cores) scores 38,558 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon W-3335.
| Feature | M4 Max (14 cores) | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 4.51 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.59 GHz | 3.4 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | — | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | — | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,558 | 39,293+2% |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Max (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Max (14 cores) versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the M4 Max (14 cores) supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Max (14 cores)) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Max (14 cores)) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).
| Feature | M4 Max (14 cores) | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8533+167% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 0 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Max (14 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). The M4 Max (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core)), while the Xeon W-3335 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M4 Max (14 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | M4 Max (14 cores) | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M4 Max GPU (32-core) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon W-3335
