M4 Max (16 cores) vs Core i5-10400F
M4 Max (16 cores)
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar M4 Max (16 cores)
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | M4 Max (16 cores) | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | M4 Max (16 cores) | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i5-10400F
M4 Max (16 cores)
The M4 Max (16 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 43,985 points. Launch price was $499.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The M4 Max (16 cores) packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the M4 Max (16 cores) has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (16 cores) versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 4.8% clock advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores) (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Max (16 cores) scores 43,985 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 108.6% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 4,060 vs 1,454, a 94.5% lead for the M4 Max (16 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,675 vs 5,783 (128.7% advantage for the M4 Max (16 cores)).
| Feature | M4 Max (16 cores) | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.51 GHz+5% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 2.9 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | — | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 43,985+238% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 4,060+179% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,675+361% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Max (16 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to Unified Memory memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 8 (M4 Max (16 cores)) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 40 (M4 Max (16 cores)) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple Silicon (M4 Max (16 cores)) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | M4 Max (16 cores) | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | Unified Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Max (16 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The M4 Max (16 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple 40-core GPU), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Max (16 cores) targets Professional Laptop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: M4 Max (16 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | M4 Max (16 cores) | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple 40-core GPU | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Apple Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Laptop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i5-10400F
