Microsoft SQ1 vs Core i7-5700HQ
Microsoft SQ1
Core i7-5700HQ
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Microsoft SQ1 is positioned at rank 877 and the Core i7-5700HQ is on rank 883, so the Microsoft SQ1 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Microsoft SQ1
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-5700HQ
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Microsoft SQ1 | Core i7-5700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) / 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-H (2015) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Microsoft SQ1 | Core i7-5700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Microsoft SQ1 and Core i7-5700HQ
Microsoft SQ1
The Microsoft SQ1 is manufactured by Microsoft. It was released in 2 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 6,039 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i7-5700HQ
The Core i7-5700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,037 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Microsoft SQ1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-5700HQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Microsoft SQ1 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Microsoft SQ1 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-5700HQ — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-5700HQ. The Microsoft SQ1 uses the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture (7 nm), while the Core i7-5700HQ uses Broadwell-H (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Microsoft SQ1 scores 6,039 against the Core i7-5700HQ's 6,037 — a 0% lead for the Microsoft SQ1. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Microsoft SQ1 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-5700HQ.
| Feature | Microsoft SQ1 | Core i7-5700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) | Broadwell-H (2015) |
| PassMark | 6,039 | 6,037 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Microsoft SQ1 and Core i7-5700HQ
