Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Quadro FX 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Quadro FX 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

2010

Why buy it

✅+13.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (45 vs 51).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.3% in PassMark G3D (51 vs 45), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300 vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 scores 51 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 leads by 13.3%. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	51+13%	45
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+80%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M carries 256 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 2300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9.0c	9.0c
OpenGL	2.0	2.1+5%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Quadro FX 350M
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	1.0+400%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 2300 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 2300	Quadro FX 350M
MSRP	$100	—
Codename	Broadway	GT200B
Release	January 7 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#846	#815

Search Mobility Radeon HD 2300 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 350M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.