Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs Radeon X1600 Pro

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

2009Core: 550 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020Core: 1130 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

2009

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $100 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 201% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • βœ…Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
  • βœ…More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019βˆ’2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌
    204.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1600 Pro is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (99 vs 98), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 201% (2.0 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1600 Pro has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 3430 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 scores 98 and the Radeon X1600 Pro reaches 99 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
G3D Mark Score
98
99+1%
Architecture
TeraScale
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
2048+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS
6.39 TFLOPS+626%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 Pro gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3430 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) β€” the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 9.0c (Radeon X1600 Pro). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0c
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs None (Radeon X1600 Pro). Decoder: UVD vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon X1600 Pro).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
Encoder
Avivo HD
None
Decoder
UVD
Avivo
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 draws 30W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W β€” a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
TDP
30W-80%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
β€”
168mm
Height
β€”
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
β€”
75
Perf/Watt
3.3+371%
0.7
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3430 came in at $49, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 3430 was 67.1% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 3430) vs 0.7 (Radeon X1600 Pro) β€” the Mobility Radeon HD 3430 offers 185.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3430Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP
$49-67%
$149
Performance per Dollar
2.0+186%
0.7
Codename
M98
Navi 10
Release
January 9 2009
January 21 2020
Ranking
#927
#216

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.