Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Quadro NVS 510M
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Popular choices:
Quadro NVS 510M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is positioned at rank 590 and the Quadro NVS 510M is on rank 273, so the Quadro NVS 510M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 510M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro NVS 510M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3670.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 | Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro NVS 510M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and Quadro NVS 510M
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 232 points.
Quadro NVS 510M
The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 scores 232 and the Quadro NVS 510M reaches 238 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro NVS 510M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 510M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 | Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 232 | 238+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+62% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 768 KB+860% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 | Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 | Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 draws 50W versus the Quadro NVS 510M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 510M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 | Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6+92% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 510M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 | Quadro NVS 510M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | Broadway | GF110 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | February 22 2011 |
| Ranking | #846 | #733 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and Quadro NVS 510M
