Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Quadro NVS 510M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Quadro NVS 510M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Quadro NVS 510M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro NVS 510M

2011

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 510M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (238 vs 232), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro NVS 510M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Quadro NVS 510M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 232 points.

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 scores 232 and the Quadro NVS 510M reaches 238 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro NVS 510M uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 510M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3670	Quadro NVS 510M
G3D Mark Score	232	238+3%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+62%	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	48+20%
L1 Cache	80 KB	768 KB+860%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3670	Quadro NVS 510M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 510M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3670	Quadro NVS 510M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 draws 50W versus the Quadro NVS 510M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 510M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3670	Quadro NVS 510M
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	4.6+92%	2.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro NVS 510M (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 3670	Quadro NVS 510M
MSRP	$79	—
Codename	Broadway	GF110
Release	January 7 2010	February 22 2011
Ranking	#846	#733

Search Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on Amazon

Search Quadro NVS 510M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.