Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon R5 230

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 230

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon R5 230 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon R5 230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 58% HIGHER MSRP
    $79 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon R5 230

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $29 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • Delivers 51.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (232 vs 222), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.2% (4.4 vs 2.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 3670 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 3670 vs Radeon R5 230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 232 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 230

The Radeon R5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 scores 232 and the Radeon R5 230 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 230 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 384 (Radeon R5 230). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 230).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3670Radeon R5 230
G3D Mark Score
232+5%
222
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+42%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3670Radeon R5 230
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 230 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 3670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 230. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 230) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3670Radeon R5 230
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 230's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 350W (Radeon R5 230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3670Radeon R5 230
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
4.6+5%
4.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 came in at $79, while the Radeon R5 230 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R5 230 was 36.7% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) vs 4.4 (Radeon R5 230) — the Radeon R5 230 offers 51.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 230 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3670Radeon R5 230
MSRP
$79
$50-37%
Performance per Dollar
2.9
4.4+52%
Codename
Broadway
Weston
Release
January 7 2010
April 18 2017
Ranking
#846
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.