Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
VS
GeForce GT 540M

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs GeForce GT 540M

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

2008Core: 660 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 540M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is positioned at rank 689 and the GeForce GT 540M is on rank 172, so the GeForce GT 540M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

#679
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
10242%
#681
9285%
#682
9260%
#686
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
8421%
#687
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
8363%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
100%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
96%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
95%
#693
MOBILITY RADEON X600
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#694
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#695
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
92%
#696
Mobility Radeon X2300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
92%
#697
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $12
91%
#698
GeForce 8600 GTS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $35
88%
#699
GeForce 8800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $50
88%
#700
Mobility Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
86%
#701
GeForce 8800 GTS
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
86%
#702
GeForce 7650 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
84%
#703
GeForce 8600M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
84%
#704
Mobility Radeon X1400
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 540M

#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
99%
#161
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
344%
#163
311%
#164
311%
#168
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
282%
#169
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
281%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#176
GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#178
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
97%
#179
97%
#180
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
96%
#181
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#182
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#186
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 540M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+49900%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 540M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 540M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+65.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and GeForce GT 540M

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 1 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 660 MHz. It has 320 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 478 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 540M

The GeForce GT 540M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 474 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 scores 478 and the GeForce GT 540M reaches 474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GT 540M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 384 (GeForce GT 540M). Raw compute: 0.4224 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 540M).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
G3D Mark Score
478
474
Architecture
TeraScale
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320 ×2
384+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4224 TFLOPS ×2
0.7427 TFLOPS+76%
ROPs
16 ×2
16
TMUs
16 ×2
32+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 comes with 2 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 540M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 540M offers 49900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
VRAM Capacity
0.002 GB
1 GB+49900%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 540M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
DirectX
10.1
11.0+9%
Max Displays
0
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs No (GeForce GT 540M). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD VP4.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
Encoder
UVD
No
Decoder
UVD
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 draws 110W versus the GeForce GT 540M's 50W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GT 540M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 350W (GeForce GT 540M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
TDP
110W
50W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.3
9.5+121%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 540M costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 15.8 (GeForce GT 540M) — the GeForce GT 540M offers 64.6% better value. The GeForce GT 540M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2GeForce GT 540M
MSRP
$449
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$30-40%
Performance per Dollar
9.6
15.8+65%
Codename
M88
GK107
Release
September 1 2008
January 9 2013
Ranking
#919
#792