
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Quadro FX 1800M

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 1800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is positioned at rank 689 and the Quadro FX 1800M is on rank 62, so the Quadro FX 1800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 49900% more VRAM (1 GB vs 2 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+49900%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and Quadro FX 1800M

Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 1 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 660 MHz. It has 320 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 478 points.

Quadro FX 1800M
The Quadro FX 1800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 486 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 scores 478 and the Quadro FX 1800M reaches 486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 1800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1800M). Raw compute: 0.4224 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 478 | 486+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 ×2+33% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4224 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.6221 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 16 ×2 | 80+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 comes with 2 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1800M has 1 GB. The Quadro FX 1800M offers 49900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.002 GB | 1 GB+49900% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 11.1 (10_1) (Quadro FX 1800M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.1 (10_1)+10% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs None (Quadro FX 1800M). Decoder: UVD vs PureVideo HD (VP4).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | None |
| Decoder | UVD | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 draws 110W versus the Quadro FX 1800M's 189W — a 52.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Quadro FX 1800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-42% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3+65% | 2.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















