Mobility Radeon HD 4250 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

2010Core: 700 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

0.0%

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

Mobility Radeon HD 3410

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

Mobility Radeon X2500

7,869

+7929.6%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is positioned at rank #694 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4250

#683

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

11079%

#685

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

10043%

#686

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

10016%

#690

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

9108%

#691

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

9046%

#693

Mobility Radeon X2300 HD

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#694

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

100%

#695

Mobility Radeon X2300

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#696

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $12

98%

#697

GeForce 8600 GTS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $35

95%

#698

GeForce 8800 GTX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $50

95%

#699

Mobility Radeon HD 3450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

93%

#700

GeForce 8800 GTS

MSRP: $449|Avg: $50

93%

#701

GeForce 8600M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

91%

#702

GeForce 7650 GS

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

91%

#703

Mobility Radeon X1400

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

90%

#704

GeForce 8600 GT

MSRP: $159|Avg: $15

90%

#705

GeForce 7900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

88%

#706

GeForce 6150SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

85%

#707

Mobility Radeon X1350

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

84%

#708

Mobility Radeon X1300

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7929.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4250.

Insight	Mobility Radeon HD 4250	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-7929.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+7929.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1505.9% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon HD 4250.

Insight	Mobility Radeon HD 4250	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1505.9%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Mobility Radeon HD 4250 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4250 and GeForce GTX 1650

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 scores 98 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 7929.6%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4250	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	98	7,869+7930%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	800	896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	80 KB	896 KB+1020%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4250	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4250	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4250	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	2.0	104.9+5145%

💰

Value Analysis

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1513.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).