Mobility Radeon HD 4570 vs Quadro 400

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 400

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1252 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4570 vs Quadro 400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4570 vs Quadro 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $120 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Delivers 249.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.1 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quadro 400

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 244.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $169 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (150 vs 148), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 249.6% (3.1 vs 0.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon HD 4570 vs Quadro 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

The Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 400

The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 4570 scores 150 and the Quadro 400 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4570 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4570) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4570) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4570Quadro 400
G3D Mark Score
150+1%
148
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
800+213%
256
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+75%
0.641 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40+150%
16
L1 Cache
80 KB
96 KB+20%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4570Quadro 400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and 64-bit on the Quadro 400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4570) vs 512 KB (Quadro 400) — the Quadro 400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4570Quadro 400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4570) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4570Quadro 400
DirectX
10.1
10_1
Max Displays
0
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4570 draws 50W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 50% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4570) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4570Quadro 400
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
3.0
4.9+63%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 came in at $49, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 4570 was 71% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4570) vs 0.9 (Quadro 400) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 offers 244.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 400 (2017 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4570Quadro 400
MSRP
$49-71%
$169
Performance per Dollar
3.1+244%
0.9
Codename
Broadway
GP107
Release
January 7 2010
February 7 2017
Ranking
#846
#741

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.