Mobility Radeon HD 5000 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7680

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 98% HIGHER MSRP
    $99 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A8-7680

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Delivers 102.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (791 vs 773), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7680 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 102.6% (15.8 vs 7.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-7680 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Mobility Radeon HD 5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 vs Radeon R7 A8-7680 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7680

The Radeon R7 A8-7680 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 791 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 scores 773 and the Radeon R7 A8-7680 reaches 791 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 A8-7680 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5000) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5000) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7680).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 5000Radeon R7 A8-7680
G3D Mark Score
773
791+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800
1024+28%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+78%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
256 KB+220%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 5000Radeon R7 A8-7680
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7680. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 5000) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7680) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 5000Radeon R7 A8-7680
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7680's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5000) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7680). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 5000Radeon R7 A8-7680
TDP
50W-50%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
15.5+96%
7.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 A8-7680 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7680 was 49.5% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 5000) vs 15.8 (Radeon R7 A8-7680) — the Radeon R7 A8-7680 offers 102.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-7680 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 5000Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP
$99
$50-49%
Performance per Dollar
7.8
15.8+103%
Codename
Broadway
Trinidad
Release
January 7 2010
June 18 2015
Ranking
#846
#467

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.